3d scanning artec space spider  (ARTEC CO LTD)

Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Article Title: 3D Scanners in Orthodontics—Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review

doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031121

Figure Lengend Snippet: Characteristics of the included studies.

Article Snippet: Winkler & Gkantidis 2020 [ ] , Case—control study , Comparison of the precision of intraoral scanners and the industrial scanner , 3D scan with industrial scanner Artec Space Spider, with CS 3600, with TRIOS 3 , 12 adult volunteers (8 men, 4 women, age: 27–52 years) , 3D scans with the use of: (a) CS 3600, (b) TRIOS 3. , 3D scan with industrial scanner Artec Space Spider , Carestream 3600 3Shape Trios 3 , The precision of the intraoral scanners (TRIOS 3 and CS 3600) was tested after superimposing the dental arch surface models obtained from repeated scans. In overall, TRIOS 3 showed better precision than the CS 3600(approximately 10μm). However, looking into the detail, both devices showed a clear imprecision, especially on buccal side of anterior teeth. Both devices do not show the accuracy of an industrial scanner, however, their accuracy is completely sufficient for clinical applications..

Techniques: Control, Comparison, Produced, Software

Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Article Title: 3D Scanners in Orthodontics—Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives—A Systematic Review

doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031121

Figure Lengend Snippet: Evaluation of case—control studies according to Newcastle—Ottawa quality assessment.

Article Snippet: Winkler & Gkantidis 2020 [ ] , Case—control study , Comparison of the precision of intraoral scanners and the industrial scanner , 3D scan with industrial scanner Artec Space Spider, with CS 3600, with TRIOS 3 , 12 adult volunteers (8 men, 4 women, age: 27–52 years) , 3D scans with the use of: (a) CS 3600, (b) TRIOS 3. , 3D scan with industrial scanner Artec Space Spider , Carestream 3600 3Shape Trios 3 , The precision of the intraoral scanners (TRIOS 3 and CS 3600) was tested after superimposing the dental arch surface models obtained from repeated scans. In overall, TRIOS 3 showed better precision than the CS 3600(approximately 10μm). However, looking into the detail, both devices showed a clear imprecision, especially on buccal side of anterior teeth. Both devices do not show the accuracy of an industrial scanner, however, their accuracy is completely sufficient for clinical applications..

Techniques: Selection, Control, Generated, Sequencing, Software